Positive Reviews: Cycle Analysis Provides Historical References and Future Opportunity Insights for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Cycles and Wealth‘s review of historical super – cycles and prediction of the post – modern cycle offer a precious “time telescope” for innovators and entrepreneurs. This cycle research based on historical laws is valuable not only for explaining the past but also for helping entrepreneurs understand the present and seize future opportunities.
First of all, the common characteristics of historical super – cycles provide a methodological framework for entrepreneurs to identify opportunities. The three driving factors of super – cycles summarized in the book – initial low valuation, low cost of capital, and low yield – essentially represent the concentrated manifestation of “value depressions” in the market. Take the post – World War II super – cycle from 1949 to 1968 as an example. The economic recovery promoted by the Marshall Plan, the demand expansion brought about by the baby boom, and the low post – war asset prices formed a triple dividend of “demand – supply – valuation”. During this period, a large number of entrepreneurial opportunities emerged in the consumer and manufacturing sectors in the United States. For instance, companies like McDonald’s and Disney completed their primitive accumulation during this time. Similarly, in the modern cycle from 1982 to 2000, the decline in interest rates due to the solution of inflation problems, the deepening of globalization, and the technological revolution (such as the popularization of personal computers) gave birth to technology giants like Microsoft and Amazon. These cases confirm that when the market is at the “starting point of the cycle” with low valuation, declining cost of capital, and bottoming – out yield, it is often the golden window for innovation and entrepreneurship.
Secondly, the eight driving factors of the post – modern cycle point out structural opportunities for entrepreneurs. The trends proposed in the book, such as “regionalization replacing globalization”, “increase in capital expenditure”, “ESG and carbon – reduction demand”, and “productivity improvement by artificial intelligence”, directly correspond to the current and future entrepreneurial hotspots. For example, under the trend of supply – chain regionalization, local supply – chain service providers and regional warehousing and logistics enterprises will experience an explosion in demand; the inclination of capital expenditure towards physical assets (such as factories and infrastructure) and the ESG field means that there is a huge market in new – energy equipment manufacturing, green building technology, and industrial energy – saving solutions; the improvement of productivity by artificial intelligence may reconstruct the service models of traditional industries such as education, healthcare, and manufacturing, providing opportunities for AI application entrepreneurs in vertical fields. In addition, the “security needs” brought about by geopolitical tensions and multipolarity will also promote innovation in fields such as defense technology, domestic substitution of key materials, and data security.
Finally, the “Buffett – style wisdom” at the cycle inflection point provides a model for entrepreneurs in risk control. As mentioned in the news, Buffett chose to withdraw at the peak of the 1968 super – cycle, which is essentially a clear understanding that “the cycle is unsustainable”. This ability to “foresee recession in prosperity” is crucial for entrepreneurs. Historically, many enterprises over – expanded at the peak of the cycle (such as Internet companies during the 2000 technology bubble and financial institutions during the 2007 real – estate bubble) and eventually fell into debt crises when the cycle declined. Entrepreneurs who can identify the cycle inflection point can often adjust their strategies in advance – for example, reducing aggressive investments, reserving cash flow, and focusing on core businesses – so as to survive the cycle transition and seize the next round of opportunities.
Negative Reviews: Limitations of the Cycle Theory and Potential Challenges of the Post – Modern Cycle
Although cycle analysis provides important references for innovation and entrepreneurship, its limitations need to be careful; the complexity of the post – modern cycle may also bring new challenges to entrepreneurs.
Firstly, the “historical induction method” of the cycle theory is difficult to fully predict the future. The summary of super – cycles and “fat and flat” periods in the book is essentially based on the induction of past data. However, “black – swan” events in the market environment (such as the COVID – 19 pandemic and the Russia – Ukraine conflict) and technological revolutions (such as AI and quantum computing) may break the traditional cycle laws. For example, the “productivity improvement by artificial intelligence” mentioned in the post – modern cycle may significantly shorten the “recession – recovery” time of the traditional cycle and even create an “atypical cycle” – technological breakthroughs may directly skip the “low – growth” stage and push the economy into a new high – growth track. If entrepreneurs rely too much on historical cycle models, they may underestimate the subversiveness of technological changes, miss innovation opportunities, or misjudge risks.
Secondly, the “multi – variable superposition” of the post – modern cycle increases the difficulty of entrepreneurial decision – making. Different from the single or few driving factors of past super – cycles (such as “declining inflation + globalization” after 1982), the eight driving factors of the post – modern cycle (rising cost of capital, regionalization, labor shortage, increasing government debt, etc.) are intertwined, and their directions may be contradictory. For example, the rising cost of capital will inhibit corporate financing and expansion, but the increase in capital expenditure (such as supply – chain reconstruction and ESG investment) requires a large amount of capital investment; regionalization may reduce the efficiency of the global supply chain but will also create opportunities for domestic substitution. This “contradictory trend” requires entrepreneurs to be more flexible in strategic choices. If they blindly follow a certain trend (such as over – betting on regionalization and ignoring the remaining opportunities of globalization), it may lead to resource misallocation.
Thirdly, the low – return characteristics of the “fat and flat” period may intensify the survival pressure of entrepreneurs. Historically, “fat and flat” periods (such as from 1968 to 1982 and from 2000 to 2009) were characterized by “high volatility and low returns”. The overall market return rate was low, but there were high – risk and high – return opportunities locally. If the post – modern cycle shows similar characteristics, entrepreneurs will face a more severe market environment: on the one hand, the primary – market financing may tighten due to the rising cost of capital, and the valuation of early – stage projects will be under pressure; on the other hand, consumer demand will be weak due to the slowdown of economic growth, and enterprises need to strike a difficult balance between “cost control” and “innovation investment”. For example, after the bursting of the 2000 technology bubble, many Internet companies went bankrupt due to cash – flow problems, and only a few (such as Amazon) survived and rose by transforming into e – commerce. If the post – modern cycle enters the “fat and flat” stage, the error – tolerance space for entrepreneurs will be compressed, and the requirements for strategic accuracy and execution efficiency will be higher.
Advice for Entrepreneurs: Anchor “Certainty” in Cycle Fluctuations
Based on the analysis of cycle laws and the prediction of the post – modern cycle, entrepreneurs can optimize their strategies in the following directions:
Establish “cycle thinking” and dynamically calibrate the strategic direction: Regularly review the market cycle stage (for example, by tracking indicators such as valuation levels, cost of capital, and yield) to determine whether the current stage is a super – cycle, a “fat and flat” period, or a transition stage. For example, in the early stage of the post – modern cycle dominated by “rising cost of capital + regionalization”, entrepreneurs can give priority to deploying in areas such as supply – chain localization, ESG – related technologies (such as carbon capture and renewable energy), and AI – enabled efficiency improvement; if the cycle turns to “low growth + high volatility”, they need to shrink non – core businesses and focus on “anti – cycle” tracks with stable cash flow (such as essential consumer goods and healthcare).
Find “cross – opportunities” in “trend contradictions”: In view of the multi – variable superposition characteristics of the post – modern cycle, pay attention to the intersection points of different trends. For example, the combination of regionalization and ESG may give birth to “local green supply – chain” services (such as low – carbon logistics within the region and local renewable energy supply); the contradiction between rising cost of capital and increasing capital expenditure can be solved through the “light – asset + technology output” model (such as providing AI transformation solutions for traditional enterprises instead of directly investing in heavy assets).
Strengthen the “anti – fragility” ability to cope with cycle fluctuations: Referring to Buffett’s wisdom of “stockpiling ammunition in prosperity”, control the debt scale and accumulate cash flow during the upward phase of the cycle (such as when financing is smooth and market demand is strong); acquire high – quality assets at low prices during the downward phase of the cycle (such as when capital tightens and demand is weak) (such as acquiring technology teams and core patents). At the same time, build a flexible organizational structure to ensure the ability to quickly adjust the business direction (for example, through modular product design, quickly switch to serve different regions or industries).
Beware of the “historical – experience trap” and embrace technological innovation: Avoid over – relying on historical cycle models and focus on the impact of disruptive technologies (such as general artificial intelligence and nuclear fusion) on the cycle rhythm. For example, if AI significantly improves total factor productivity, it may shorten the “low – growth” stage and push the economy into a new super – cycle. Entrepreneurs should be sensitive to cutting – edge technologies and pre – deploy in areas that may change the cycle through methods such as cooperative R & D and investment incubation.
Cycles are both the “creators” and “devourers” of wealth. For entrepreneurs, understanding cycle laws is not to “predict the future” but to find a “certainty anchor” in uncertainty – by grasping cycle driving factors, avoiding cycle risks, and seizing opportunities in cycle transitions, they can ultimately achieve “cross – cycle” growth in long – term competition.
- Chain Exploration”Lazy People’s Financial Management Strategies | Binance Increases USDC Subsidies; “AI Stablecoin” with $13 Million in Financing to Be Launched (August 18)”
- Startup Commentary””I’m Afraid I Won’t Live to Graduate”: AI Triggers a Dropout Wave in the US, and an 18-Year-Old’s PPT-Style Entrepreneurship Shocks the Father of Y Combinator”
- Startup Commentary”Signs of Recovery Emerge in Hong Kong’s Residential Property Market”
- Startup Commentary”How to Determine Whether It’s Still Feasible to Enter a Project?”
- Chain Exploration”Stock Tokenization: The Second Growth Curve of Liquidity for the Times”
