Read More《包装越小，生意越大?拆解食品饮料“迷你化”的产品逻辑》
Positive Reviews: The “Miniaturization” of Food and Beverages is a Demand-Driven Product Innovation that Activates New Consumption Scenarios and Brand Growth Momentum
In recent years, the “miniaturization” wave in the food and beverage industry is by no means a simple adjustment of packaging size. Instead, it is a profound upgrade of product strategies centered around changes in consumer demands. From ice cream and potato chips to beer and instant noodles, the collective popularity of small-packaged products essentially represents brands’ precise responses to users’ health awareness, diversified consumption scenarios, and consumption psychology. Its positive significance is mainly reflected in the following three aspects:
I. Precisely Fit the Trend of Healthy Consumption and Reduce Users’ Psychological and Physiological Burdens of “Indulging Cravings”
With the popularization of health awareness, consumers are both “craving” and “afraid” of food and beverages high in calories, sugar, and additives. “Miniaturization” provides a compromise solution. For example, the 20g “underage ice cream,” 12g mini potato chips, and 168ml small cans of fruit wine, through the “just one bite” small-portion design, control the calories and sugar intake per serving within an acceptable range, significantly reducing users’ sense of guilt. This “small and refined” packaging is not only a reduction in physical specifications but also an insight into users’ psychological needs – wanting to eat but not wanting to overindulge, wanting to satisfy their appetites without sacrificing health.
What’s even more noteworthy is that “miniaturization” and product formula upgrades have formed a synergistic effect. As mentioned in the news, while reducing the packaging size, ice cream brands are simultaneously promoting formula optimization such as sugar reduction, low-fat content, and clean labels. Small packages have become the “visual carriers” of these healthy improvements. For example, brands like Nestle emphasize “low-calorie” and “no additives” through mini packages. Users can more intuitively perceive the healthy attributes of the products through the experience of “finishing in one bite,” thereby reducing their resistance to high-priced healthy products. This combined strategy of “small package + health improvement” has successfully transformed what might have been “healthy products” rejected by users into daily consumer goods that allow for “indulging cravings without burden.”
II. Expand the Boundaries of Consumption Scenarios and Promote the Transformation of Non-Essential Categories into “Snack-like” and “Daily” Consumption
The consumption scenarios of traditional food and beverages are relatively fixed: ice cream is mostly for post-meal or summer heat relief, potato chips are the “sidekick” when watching TV shows, and small wines are limited to gatherings or solo drinking. “Miniaturization” breaks this limitation, enabling products to more flexibly integrate into users’ fragmented needs.
Take ice cream as an example. The mini version, with its “bite-sized” design, has successfully entered the snack scenario – the daily snacking habit of the Gen Z group has made mini ice cream a new choice for replenishing energy between meals or pairing with coffee during afternoon tea. The multi-pack combination is suitable for social scenarios. Sharing the “mini family” pack during friend gatherings not only satisfies the need for trying new things but also avoids waste. The parent-child pack more precisely targets the children’s market. Parents don’t have to worry about their children eating too much, and the small portion actually increases the purchase frequency. Similarly, the 200ml mini cans of Coke and 135ml small cans of beer have also become “light-burden options” for outdoor and sports scenarios due to their portability.
This expansion of scenarios directly drives up the consumption frequency and customer unit price. As mentioned in the news, the multi-pack sales of Magnum mini have increased the consumers’ single purchase volume from 1 piece to 4 – 6 pieces, and the total amount is even higher than that of the traditional single-piece pack. The 168ml * 4 bottle combination pack of Jiangxiaobai Fruit Cube has also increased the purchase volume driven by users’ “try-new” psychology through its “small and beautiful” design. The diversification of scenarios has transformed what was originally “impulse consumption” for non-essential products into high-frequency “daily consumption,” opening up new growth space for brands.
III. Help Brands Achieve “Cost Reduction and Efficiency Improvement” and Balance Cost Pressure and Profit Margins
The rising raw material prices have been a common challenge for the food and beverage industry in recent years, and “miniaturization” provides a feasible path for brands to optimize costs. On the one hand, small packages directly reduce production costs by reducing the raw material usage per serving (e.g., ice cream is reduced from 65g to 42g). On the other hand, although the price per gram may increase (e.g., the price per gram of Magnum mini increases by about 9%), the “low-price perception” of small packages (lower single-piece price) and the “buy-more-get-discount” of combination packs make users more likely to accept price adjustments, allowing brands to increase profit margins without causing obvious resistance.
The 2023 financial report of Unilever shows that although the sales volume of its ice cream business decreased by 6%, the sales revenue increased by 2.3%, mainly due to an 8.8% price increase, and the launch of mini products was the key support for this strategy. This “shrinkflation,” although controversial, provides a buffer space for brands to survive and develop under cost pressure. Especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, the flexible adjustment ability of small packages (such as quickly launching multi-specification combinations) makes it easier to cope with market fluctuations than large packages.
Negative Reviews: “Miniaturization” Hides Risks of Consumption Trust and Industry Homogenization. Beware of Blindly Following the Trend of “Going Small for the Sake of Going Small”
Although the “miniaturization” trend shows strong market vitality, the potential problems behind it cannot be ignored. If brands overly rely on packaging adjustments while ignoring the essence of products or blindly follow the trend, resulting in homogeneous competition, it may weaken consumers’ trust and even hinder the long-term healthy development of the industry.
I. “Shrinkflation” May Overdraw Users’ Trust and Trigger Controversies over “Hidden Price Increases”
One of the core logics of “miniaturization” is to increase the profit per gram by reducing the product size, but this strategy has a “trust risk.” For example, the regular 65g Magnum is sold at 51 yuan for 6 pieces, while the 42g mini version is sold at 36.9 yuan for 6 pieces. The price per gram increases from about 0.13 yuan to about 0.14 yuan, an increase of about 9%. Although the single-piece price drops from 8.5 yuan to 6.15 yuan, giving users the perception of a “cheaper” product, the actual cost per gram increases. Once consumers notice this “price game,” it may trigger negative evaluations of “hidden price increases” and even damage the brand’s reputation.
More importantly, some brands have turned “miniaturization” into a simple tool for cost transfer rather than an innovation based on user needs. For example, some potato chip brands have launched 12g small packages, but the price is close to one-third of the traditional 40g pack (i.e., a higher price per gram), and they have not optimized the formula or improved the quality. Users will think that “the small package is just for making more money.” This “going small for the sake of going small” operation may lead consumers to resist the “miniaturization” trend as a whole, thereby suppressing market growth.
II. Overpackaging and Homogeneous Competition May Intensify Resource Waste and Lack of Innovation
To enhance the “cute factor” or “scenario adaptability,” many mini products use multi-pack combinations, which objectively increases the use of packaging materials. For example, a 6-pack of mini ice cream requires individual small packages + an outer box. Compared with the traditional single-piece large package, the packaging cost and resource consumption may be higher. If brands ignore environmental protection design (such as using biodegradable materials), “miniaturization” may evolve into “overpackaging,” which goes against the current advocated concept of green consumption.
In addition, the phenomenon of industry follow – the – trend has emerged. From ice cream to potato chips, beer, and instant noodles, brands in various categories have launched small packages, but most products only make adjustments in specifications and lack differentiated innovation. For example, the mini ice creams of different brands are highly similar in taste and formula, and the “small package + combination pack” model of mini potato chips also tends to be the same. This homogeneous competition may lead to market saturation, the rapid disappearance of users’ freshness towards “miniaturization,” and ultimately fall into the quagmire of “price war,” squeezing the industry’s profit margins.
III. The Deviation between “Healthy” Claims and Actual Effects May Damage Product Credibility
Some brands directly link “miniaturization” with “health,” promoting that “small portion = low calorie = healthy,” but the actual effects may be questionable. For example, although some mini ice creams are small in weight, the sugar and fat content has not been significantly reduced. Just because users can “finish it in one bite,” they have the illusion of “health.” Some small-packaged potato chips still use the frying process, and the essence of high salt and high oil remains unchanged. If users consume these “small but unhealthy” products for a long time, it may cause “cumulative health problems,” and they will ultimately blame the brand for “false advertising.”
What’s even more concerning is that the small – packaging of healthy beverages (such as 210ml mineral water and 300ml electrolyte water) was originally designed for specific scenarios (such as for children or when going out), but some brands blindly launched small packages to follow the “miniaturization” trend without solving the core needs (such as insufficient portability and mismatched capacity with scenarios), resulting in product unsaleability and wasting the opportunity for market education.
Suggestions for Entrepreneurs: Focus on User Needs and Deeply Explore Product Value in the “Small”
The “miniaturization” trend of food and beverages provides new track opportunities for entrepreneurs, but to avoid falling into the misunderstanding of “going small for the sake of going small,” they need to deeply explore from the following aspects:
I. Deeply Understand User Needs and Clarify the Core Value of “Miniaturization”
Entrepreneurs need to go beyond the superficial thinking of “reducing packaging size” and design products around users’ real needs. For example, for health – sensitive users, they need to optimize the formula simultaneously (such as reducing sugar and fat) instead of just relying on the small portion to “cover up” the problem. For scenario – based needs (such as for children, social events, or going out), they need to precisely match the specifications (such as emphasizing safety and fun in parent – child packs and focusing on lightweight design in portable packs). At the same time, they need to verify the necessity of “miniaturization” through user research (such as questionnaires and taste tests). If the large package can already meet the core scenario needs (such as family sharing), there is no need to force “miniaturization.”
II. Balance Costs and User Experience to Avoid a Trust Crisis Caused by “Hidden Price Increases”
When adjusting the specifications, entrepreneurs need to transparently convey the value. For example, if the price needs to be adjusted due to the rising raw material costs, they can reduce users’ single – piece payment pressure through “small package + combination discount” (such as buy 6 get 1 free). If the formula is upgraded (such as using natural raw materials), they need to strengthen the perception of “value for money” through packaging design (such as labeling “0 additives”) or marketing content (such as short – video demonstrations of the production process). At the same time, they need to regularly monitor user feedback. If they find controversies over “hidden price increases,” they need to adjust the strategy in time (such as launching both large and small packages).
III. Strengthen Product Differentiation to Avoid Homogeneous Competition
The core of “miniaturization” is “small but unique.” Entrepreneurs need to create differentiation in taste, function, and scenario. For example, ice cream brands can launch functional mini packs with “low sugar + probiotics” to target the demand for intestinal health. Potato chip brands can develop small packages with “non – fried + regional flavors” to attract users who like to try new things. Small – can wine brands can combine “low alcohol + Chinese – style trendy design” to enter the female or young social scenario. In addition, they can enhance the emotional value of products and strengthen user stickiness through IP co – branding (such as collaborating with popular anime) or interesting packaging (such as blind – box – style combination packs).
IV. Pay Attention to Environmental Protection and Sustainability to Build a “Small but Green” Brand Image
To address the problem of packaging waste caused by multi – pack combinations, entrepreneurs can use biodegradable materials (such as PLA corn starch packaging), reduce redundant design (such as canceling the outer box and using recyclable transparent bags), or launch “empty – packaging exchange” activities to encourage users to participate in environmental protection. For example, a mini ice cream brand can launch a plan of “collect 10 empty boxes to exchange for 1 new ice cream,” which not only reduces waste but also increases the user repurchase rate. This combination of “small package + green concept” can effectively enhance the brand’s social image and attract consumers with strong environmental awareness.
V. Beware of “Healthy” Gimmicks and Support Product Claims with Real Data
If a product promotes a “healthy” attribute, it needs to support the promotion with authoritative test reports (such as low – GI certification and no – additive testing) and avoid vague expressions (such as “healthier”). For example, a mini ice cream can label “only 50 calories per piece” and “0 trans – fatty acids” and display the nutrition facts table on the detail page. Small – packaged potato chips can emphasize “non – fried” and “low salt” and provide comparison data (such as 30% less oil than traditional potato chips). Through data transparency, users can more rationally judge whether the product meets their needs, thereby establishing long – term trust.
Conclusion:
The “miniaturization” of food and beverages is not a simple packaging game but a product revolution centered around user needs. It provides brands with new tools to cope with cost pressure and expand scenarios, and also places higher requirements on entrepreneurs’ ability to understand users and innovate products. Only by centering on users, deeply exploring value in the “small,” and remaining “sincere” in the “change” can “miniaturization” truly become a long – term trend driving the progress of the industry.
创业时评《包装越小，生意越大?拆解食品饮料“迷你化”的产品逻辑》
- Startup Commentary”In the 19.9-yuan roast duck, there lies Chinese magic that the West can’t learn.”
- Startup Commentary”36Kr Going Global·Middle East | Invest Qatar’s China Visit: Gathering Top Resources for a Collaborative Future”
- Chain Exploration”PUMP Rises Against the Trend, and the Meme Launchpad Has Seen Continuous Battles in the Past Two Weeks”
- Startup Commentary”Documenting Farewells Behind the Shutter: I Became a Divorce Photographer”
- Startup Commentary”Hema Closes Membership Stores and Begins to Face New Rivals”
